Difference between revisions of "Help:Review notes"
From CompetenceBase
(→Jörn) |
(→Stefan) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Stefan== | ==Stefan== | ||
− | * why is it here? | + | * why is it here? https://competencebase.eu/wiki/Item:Q90 |
− | |||
− | |||
==Larry== | ==Larry== |
Revision as of 07:28, 19 July 2024
Contents
Jörn
- knowledge fields and details: retain redundancy in titles, but consistently use "space dash space", not slashes.
- licensing: remove NC, use CC-BY-SA
- question: remove hardcoded owner in competence label, add "owner" qualifier instead.
- attitudes: general spring-clean
- knowledge fields and blocks: add wiki introductions, why are we teaching this, what is the "spirit" of this?
- help/syntax: start with lowercase letter, no end-of-sentence marks
- Instance of "Profile" - "Essential competences" (user view): needs to be ordered by
- TeBeVAT "place in process"
- index number (last two-digit group)
- we need a query for orphaned knowledge blocks which are
- not used by any competences and not implicitly used by "prerequisite knowledge" from another knowledge detail.
- https://competencebase.eu/wiki/Item:Q216 "Work ergonomically" - which syntax are we using for attitudes?
Consider removal from ESSENCE:
- 60 30 00 03 08 ET Work safely with machines (ETTEC)
- 60 40 00 03 09 ET Work safely with chemicals (ETTEC)
Consider superseding with higher-level version
- 60 40 00 03 09 Work safely with mobile electrical systems under supervision (ETTEC) (to unsupervised!)
Bastiaan
attitude item.Q1057
Stefan
- why is it here? https://competencebase.eu/wiki/Item:Q90
Larry
PLease take a look at this competence: I think it is not valide. https://competencebase.eu/wiki/Item:Q1057
Take a look as this TEBEVAT item (Monitor Mixing) on EQF 5? https://competencebase.eu/wiki/Item:Q288