Difference between revisions of "Sound systems/Demands and trade-offs (Q916)"
From CompetenceBase
(Created claim: knowledge detail (EN) (P35): number of loudspeaker positions vs. rigging and setup costs) | (Created claim: knowledge detail (EN) (P35): number of coverage zones vs. sound degradation in overlap areas) | ||
| Property / knowledge detail (EN) | |||
| + | number of coverage zones vs. sound degradation in overlap areas (English) | ||
| Property / knowledge detail (EN): number of coverage zones vs. sound degradation in overlap areas (English) / rank | |||
| + | Normal rank | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 15 July 2024
In sound system design, there are no silver bullets. Every decision involves trade-offs and optimizes one parameter at the cost of others. Choosing the optimal trade-offs is the most important skill to deliver successful designs.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Sound systems/Demands and trade-offs | In sound system design, there are no silver bullets. Every decision involves trade-offs and optimizes one parameter at the cost of others. Choosing the optimal trade-offs is the most important skill to deliver successful designs. |
Statements
33
0 references
10
0 references
central and distributed sound reinforcement systems (English)
conflict between uniform SPL and localisation (English)
SPL uniformity (English)
usecases (English)
0 references
tools to maintain directional focus and localisation (English)
tracking systems (English)
rendering processors (English)
0 references
loudspeaker coverage area vs. directness" and excitation of room acoustics"" (English)
0 references
loudspeaker efficiency and headroom vs. power requirements (English)
0 references
loudspeaker positions vs. rigging and setup costs (English)
0 references
number of loudspeaker positions vs. rigging and setup costs (English)
0 references
number of coverage zones vs. sound degradation in overlap areas (English)
0 references
SQQ7 - 9.2.2
0 references